Learn / Tools
Artificial turf product and quote comparison worksheet Use one copy per proposal. A blank answer is useful evidence: it shows exactly what still needs to be confirmed before two prices can be compared fairly.
Printable tool Version 1.0 · July 21, 2026 Homeowner and professional use
1. Property and decision Property address, yard location, measured area, access route, and intended activities are recorded. Existing surface, soil, slopes, low points, swales, downspouts, drains, trees, utilities, easements, neighbours, and flooding history are recorded. Natural lawn, planting, pavers, deck, drainage repair, and mixed-surface alternatives were considered. Address-specific municipal, condo, tree, grading, utility, conservation, and permit questions have an identified owner and status.
2. Exact product system Manufacturer / legal supplier ________________________________________ Product name, colour, SKU ________________________________________ Roll/batch traceability ________________________________________ Pile polymer / thatch ________________________________________ Pile height / gauge / stitch rate ________________________________________ Face weight definition / total mass ________________________________________ Backing / coating / drainage construction ________________________________________ Infill name, composition, grading, quantity ________________________________________ Pad or underlay, if any ________________________________________
3. Evidence file Current exact-SKU technical data sheet with units, definitions, tolerances, and installation limits. UV/weathering, dimensional stability, tuft/filament retention, backing strength, and wear evidence appropriate to the claim. Lead/metals, PAHs, PFAS, VOCs, or other claimed results identify sample, components, method, laboratory, date, and reporting limits. Product permeability report is separated from the site drainage design, soil, base, grade, outlet, and overflow path. Laboratory accreditation and method scope are verified where independent testing is claimed. “Pet safe,” “cool,” “non-toxic,” “recyclable,” “playground safe,” and similar claims have definitions, evidence, and limitations.
4. Installation scope Excavation depth/quantity, unsuitable soil, buried conditions, disposal, and change pricing are clear. Aggregate identity, thickness/lifts, shaping, compaction process, and finished elevations are clear. Water paths, downspouts, edges, outlets, heavy-rain overflow, neighbouring property, and exclusions are clear. Roll direction, seams, cuts, transitions, fastening, edge restraint, infill application, and waste are clear. Hidden-work photos, product labels, care guide, retained material, punch list, cleanup, and handoff are included.
5. Ownership and contract Cleaning, pets, heat, snow, weeds, furniture, fire, repairs, infill, and inspection responsibilities are understood. Manufacturer product warranty and installer workmanship terms are separate, current, and tied to the proposed system. Removal, reuse/recycling/disposal, receiving facility, contamination limits, transport, and cost are documented. Legal contracting party, insurance, payment milestones, schedule, weather, changes, deficiency response, and dispute contacts are clear.
6. Final comparison Decision factor Evidence complete? Notes / unresolved risk Site and drainage fit Yes / No / Partial ____________________________ Product traceability Yes / No / Partial ____________________________ Health/claim evidence Yes / No / Partial ____________________________ Installation scope Yes / No / Partial ____________________________ Maintenance/warranty Yes / No / Partial ____________________________ Lifecycle/end of life Yes / No / Partial ____________________________ Total price and allowances $ __________________ ____________________________
Decision rule: do not score a missing answer as average. Treat it as unknown until the responsible party documents it.